Grammatical relations and grammatical categories in Malay; The Indonesian prefix meN- revisited

Johnny Tjia

Abstract


The lexical roots of Malay are flexible with regard to their grammatical categories, which presents a problem in providing grammatical evidence for their category determination. This paper attempts to propose the use of affixes as one way to deal with the issue. Data from Indonesian and Ambon (Malay) language are among others given for clarification. The grammatical evidence from Indonesian active meN-, together with other affixes, are revisited as they can contribute to our understanding of the matter.

Keywords


Grammatical categories, grammatical relations, Malay, Indonesian.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adelaar, K.A. 1985. Proto-Malayic; The reconstruction of its phonology and parts of its lexicon and morphology. PhD thesis, Leiden University.

Adelaar, K.A. 1992. Proto-Malayic; The reconstruction of its phonology and parts of its lexicon and morphology. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University. [Pacific Linguistics C119.]

Adelaar, K.A. 2002. “Salako morphology and the interrelation between voice, mood and aspect”, in: K.A. Adelaar and R. Blust (eds), Between worlds; Linguistic papers in memory of David John Prentice, pp. 1-28. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.

Cartier, A. 1979. “De-voiced transitive verb sentences in formal Indonesian”, in: F. Plank (ed.), Ergativity; Towards a theory of grammatical relations, pp. 161-183. London/New York: Academic Press.

Chung, Sandra. 1976. “On the subject of two passives in Indonesia”, in: C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, pp. 57-98. New York: Academic Press.

Collins, James. 1980. Ambonese Malay and creolization theory. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Collins, James. 1995. “Pulau Borneo sebagai titik tolak pengkajian sejarah bahasa Melayu”, Dewan Bahasa 39: 868-879.

Collins, James. 1998. Malay, world language; A short history. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Comrie, Bernard. 1978. “Ergativity”, in: Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology; Studies in the phenomenology of language, pp. 329-394. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Croft, William. 1997. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations; The cognitive organization of information. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

Cumming, Susanna. 1991. Functional change; The case of Malay constituent order. New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

DeLancey, Scott. 1982. “Aspect, transitivity and viewpoint”, in: Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect; Between semantics and pragmatics, pp. 167-184. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

DeLancey, Scott. 1990. “Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan”, Cognitive Linguistics 1: 289-321.

Dixon, R.M.W. 1977. “The syntactic development of Australian languages”, in: C.N. Li (ed.), Mechanism of syntactic change, pp. 365-415. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. “Ergativity”, Language 55: 59-138.

Fokker, A.A. 1951. Inleiding tot de studie van de Indonesische. Djakarta: Wolters.

Gil, D. 1994. “The structure of Riau Indonesian”, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17: 179-200.

Givón, T. 1984. Syntax; A functional-typological introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Givón, T. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Grijns, C.D. 1981. “Jakartan speech and Takdir Alisjahbana’s plea for the simple Indonesian word-form”, in: N. Phillips and K. Anwar (eds), Papers on Indonesian languages and literatures, pp. 1-34. London: Indonesian Etymological Project, SOAS; Paris: Association Archipel. [Cahier d’Archipel 13.]

Grimes, Barbara D. 1991. “The development and use of Ambonese Malay”, in: Hein Steinhauer (ed.), Papers in Austronesian Linguistics I, pp. 83-123. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. [Pacific Linguistics A-81.]

Hopper, Paul J. 1983. “Ergative, passive, and active in Malay narrative”, in: Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.), Discourse perspectives on syntax, pp. 67-88. New York: Academic Press.

Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse”, Language 56: 251-299.

Hopper, Paul J. and S. Thompson. 1984. “The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar”, Language 60: 703-752.

Ikranagara, Kay. 1980. Melayu Betawi Grammar. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya. [NUSA Vol. 9.]

Kähler, H. 1956. Grammatik der Bahasa Indonésia; mit Chrestomathie und Wörterverzeichnis. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [Porta linguarum orientalium 2.]

Kaswanti Purwo, B. 1986. “The presence and absence of meN-; The Indonesian transitive verbs”, in: P. Geraghty, L. Carrington, and S.A. Wurm (eds), FOCAL I; Papers from the fourth international conference on Austronesian linguistics, pp. 159-170. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. [Pacific Linguistics C-93.]

Kaswanti Purwo, B. 1988. “Voice in Indonesian; A discourse study”, in: Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, pp. 195-241. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a universal definition of ‘Subject’”, in: C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, pp. 303-333. New York: Academic Press.

Keraf, Gorys. 1969. Tatabahasa Indonesia. Ende: Nusa Indah.

Kinkade, Dale. 1983. “Salish evidence against the universality of ‘noun’ and ‘verb’”, Lingua 60: 25-40.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 1986. Kelas kata dalam bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Liaw Yock Fang. 1985. Nahu Melayu Modern. Singapura: Pustaka Antara.

Minde, van D. 1997. Malayu Ambong; Phonology, morphology, syntax. Leiden: CNWS.

Nothofer, B. 1996. “Migrasi orang Melayu purba; Kajian awal”. Paper, the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Borneo Research Council, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei, 10-15 June.

Omar, A.H. 1981. The Iban language of Sarawak; A grammatical description. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing morphosyntax; A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pungak, J.M. 1975. “Penelitian struktur bahasa Mualang; Laporan hasil penelitian, analisa struktur”. [Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.]

Schachter, Paul. 1985. “Part-of-speech systems”, in: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description; Vol. I, pp. 3-61. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Steinhauer. H. 1986. “On distinguishing adjectives and intransitive verbs in Indonesian”, in: C.S.M. Hellwig and S.O. Robson (eds), A man of Indonesian letters; Essays in honour of Professor A. Teeuw, pp. 316-322. Dordrecht: Foris.

Teeuw, A. 1962. “Some problems in the study of word-classes in Bahasa Indonesia”, Lingua 11: 409-421.

Teeuw, A. 1971. Leerboek Bahasa Indonesia. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Teeuw, A. 1977. “The morphological system of the Indonesian adjective”, NUSA; Miscelaneous studies in Indonesian and languages in Indonesia 2: 1-18.

Tjia, Johnny. 2007. A grammar of Mualang; An Ibanic language of Western Kalimantan, Indonesia. Utrecht: LOT.

Tomasowa, F.H. 2000. “Ergativity in relation to bidirectionality of processes in contemporary Indonesian: A systemic functional perspective”, in: B. Kaswanti Purwo (ed.), Kajian serba linguistik; Untuk Anton Moeliono, Pereksa bahasa, pp. 553-570. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya and BPK Gunung Mulia.

Verhaar, John W.M. 1983. “Syntactic ergativity in contemporary Indonesian”, in: Richard McGinn (ed.), Studies in Austronesian linguistics, pp. 347-384. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v16i1.368

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Free counters!   https://lh3.ggpht.com/x7QqTfmSv9q5a91R09N98xaZcp2aoVSehSpRIc5ZfwYo28BQ-EsKqXI3pjcRZydxriU=w124 https://abs.twimg.com/icons/apple-touch-icon-192x192.png

View My Stats